On Friday 25 February a meeting was held between members of the Works of LVEF in Leon (EC) and a representation of the company, made by the new Director General D. Juan Diez Lopez and the Director of Human Resources Division and Area Employment Law, D. Benitez Jesus Benitez.
The point that caused the most debate was the confirmation by these two representatives of the company, the delivery of 60,000 € to only two of the three tenants occupying the property FEVE homes in the city of León, a brother of former CEO, Mr. Amador Robles and the other , member of UGT, Mr. Fulgencio Bandera. This amount will be paid as compensation for the displacement resulting from the new reworking of environment FEVE station, which is to be held in the city of León.
company representatives tried to justify such action to the possible prosecution of eviction, which could mean a delay in the integration process FEVE in Leon for several years. This argument is not credible, because one of the residents living there have not given this economic pillar and by itself could initiate appropriate legal action and using the same criteria set by the management of the company would delay the (un) FEVE integration in Leon, maybe that's why the representation of the company hinted that even this third neighbor also would receive the same compensation.
The direction of the company solves this problem with a private agreement that is outside the existing labor laws, thus creating a precedent that may appeal to carry out their plans, showing that yes, your ability to meet the setbacks releasing extra money. Perhaps the future may be problems in this same project and also this same address may use a similar agreement not to reach the courts.
In contrast, it is true that the direction of the company has ordered evictions with very different techniques and no profit for their tenants, to cite the example similar to this case, it is inevitable to mention the eviction, which also affected tenants Stock owned in LVEF in the integration of Basurto in Bizkaia, in which the eviction was resolved ipso facto, without pay Why any amount not applied this model in this case?
Finally, and strictly to the facts found and the statements made, along with the justification for such action from the direction of LVEF, are shown on the one hand, the comparative wrongs done and secondly that has no objection to "pay" or "deport" as the case ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment